[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Suggestions for xfs

To: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Suggestions for xfs
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "Daniel E." <baggadogio@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502011529370.7140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <000401c5085c$facba270$0a01a8c0@pcdiano> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502010827170.22168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502011529370.7140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mike Burger wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Daniel E. wrote:
> > > Here are some suggestions for xfsprogs.
> > >
> > > Some people want xfs to be the standard file system for GNU/Linux. These
> >
> > Who wants this?  Linux has no standard filesystem, so I don' see how this
> > could ever be possible.
> Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS
> under linux.

Perhaps 5+ years ago, when there were no other choices.

> After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate
> filesystem, under any distribution, ext2 (maybe ext3, now) is used.

I'm pretty sure that Mandrake, or some other quasi-mainstream distro uses
ReiserFS by default.

Lonni J Friedman                                netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo                  http://netllama.ipfox.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>