| To: | martin f krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes |
| From: | Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:52:02 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050215010932.GA17722@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0502131201290.26391@jekyll.uws.edu.au> <20050211121829.GA30049@localhost.localdomain> <m1sm43uu8h.fsf@muc.de> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0502121642380.25840@jekyll.uws.edu.au> <m1r7jmf0q7.fsf@muc.de> <200502130215.j1D2FY0w679915@elmo.melbourne.sgi.com> <1108369746.3535.10.camel@venus.local.navi.pl> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0502141945560.26974@jekyll.uws.edu.au> <20050214103830.GA6385@localhost.localdomain> <16913.12592.974397.923897@jdc.local> <20050215010932.GA17722@localhost.localdomain> |
| Reply-to: | jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
martin f krafft writes: > > Well, same here. It seems like others have had different > experiences; I do not want to advocate a filesystem for > laptop/workstation use when I am not 100% sure. I would be perfectly happy to recommend it for both laptops and workstations. I would argue that the binary zeros phenomenon is not worth worrying about. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: extended attributes, XFS, and 2.6.11-rc1, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | samba on xfs fs, problems with read only, Clemens Schwaighofer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, martin f krafft |
| Next by Thread: | multithreaded processors and xfs, Pablo Cruz Navea |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |