| To: | Pablo Cruz Navea <pablo.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: multithreaded processors and xfs |
| From: | Frank Hellmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:55:05 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <410da79f050211185476207122@mail.gmail.com> |
| Organization: | Optical Art Film- und Special-Effects GmbH |
| References: | <410da79f050211185476207122@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) |
Hi Pablo! I suppose you mean the performance increase of one Pentium IV with Hyperthreading compared to one Pentium IV without? In reality (at least around here) turning on/off Hyperthreading isn't increasing I/O performance in a way that is noticable. It will help if you are doing heavy computations with the data at the same time, e.g. 3D field simulations of data on XFS partitions. For normal fileserving functionality Hyperthreading won't matter. The point of multi-threading here is, that multi-cpu boxes can run multiple threads at the same time and therefore use XFS parallel on more than just one cpu. If you are in need to get more performance, there is always the option of dual or quad xeon/opteron boxes and better storage adapters and/or RAID subsystems. Cheers,
Frank...Pablo Cruz Navea wrote: Dear list, some days ago I've read in a XFS documents that some objects like the Allocation Groups (AG) are multi-threaded. My question is: is the performance improved when we use a multi-threading processor like the Pentium IV? Please make a comparison between Pentium and some other common processors.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, Olaf Frączyk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: the thing with the binary zeroes, David J N Begley |
| Previous by Thread: | multithreaded processors and xfs, Pablo Cruz Navea |
| Next by Thread: | The Amazing disappearing filesystem (2.4.29), Robert Brockway |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |