xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: defrag xfs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: defrag xfs
From: Sonny Rao <sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:44:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050121073616.GA28939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <F62740B0EFCFC74AA6DCF52CD746242D010337FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41F07494.1060501@xxxxxxx> <20050121043237.GA28699@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050121051228.GA28161@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050121055051.GB29637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050121064532.GA28594@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050121070817.GB30287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050121073616.GA28939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:36:16PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 02:08:17AM -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
> 
> > Sure, I agree with everything you say here.  It just bugs me from a
> > completeness standpoint that XFS and JFS can't do it right now.  Call
> > it an itch.
> 
> The Namesys people were sponsored/paid for their work on the reiserfs
> resizer.
> 
> Ted Tso was paid to write the e2fs resizer with the agreement that he
> be able to release it sometime later.
> 
> If people wanted to dontate (paypal or whatever) to a fund I'm sure we
> could get someone to do this for XFS.  The same is probably true for
> JFS.

I see your point here.  Is that something people would be willing to
donate to ?  I would be willing to donate myself, but I don't know how
much it would take overall.  Should we even worry about that?

Sonny


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>