xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

extended attributes, XFS, and 2.6.11-rc1

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: extended attributes, XFS, and 2.6.11-rc1
From: James Foris <james.foris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:08:38 -0600
Reply-to: james.foris@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041229 Fedora/1.7.5-2.1
Could someone please check and let me know if this is something I have done to myself, or
a bug in the mainline linux kerel release:

I have a pretty stock i686/i686smp build of 2.6.11-rc1-bk5 from kernel.org.

The XFS configuration options are:

CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
CONFIG_XFS_RT=y
CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA=y
CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y

The test:

1. make/mount an XFS("/xfs") and an EXT2 ("/ext2") file system.
2. Create test directories under each ("/xfs/test", "/ext2/test").
3. Change the attributes of each directory to be syncronous.
        ("chattr -R +S /xfs/test /ext2/test")
4. copy a file into both directories
        ("cp /etc/inittab /xfs/test; cp /etc/inittab /ext2/test")

What I see from here is that any attempt to edit (I use vi) the
file "/xfs/test/inittab" starts with a message about a swap file
failure, and will not let me save any changes.

I can rename the file and delete the file.  I simply can not overwrite the file.

No such problems exist on my ext2 partition, and the problem goes away
if I "chattr -R -S /xfs/test".

This has appeared sometime since 2.6.10-bk3 (the last kernel I built/tested),
which was built with the same configuration options as 2.6.11-rc1-bk5.


I do not think that this is a bad build... but I could be wrong.  Does anyone
else see this too ?

Jim Foris


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>