xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [REPOST] [PATCH] fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.c

To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [REPOST] [PATCH] fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.c
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:01:03 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1102509231l.23125l.0l@traveler>; from miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:33:51PM +0000
References: <20041115103130.GA7971@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041117232247.GA9834@frodo> <1101386106l.15668l.0l@traveler> <20041126041132.GA1426@frodo> <1101486186l.15668l.4l@traveler> <1102509231l.23125l.0l@traveler>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Hi Mike,

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:33:51PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On 2004.11.26 17:23, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> 
> Hi Nathan, not to rush you or anything, but I was just curious as
> to how a patch like this gets into the actual kernel.
> 
> I assume it's XFS CVS -> testing -> -mm kernel -> linus kernel ?

Its actually like this, for an XFS-only change (differs a bit
if there's a core kernel change, that adds in a -mm step near
the end):

Testing (my machines, several days/weeks depending on the change),
including nightly regression test runs.
  |
  v
Internal review by other XFS developers.
  |
  v
CVS on oss.sgi.com (via our internal ptools tree).
  |
  v
Linus' kernel.

> I don't see anything in XFS CVS at
> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/
> yet, am I looking in the right place ?

That's the right place; the first two steps are done, I expect
to push it into CVS sometime today, and I plan to merge it and
several other fixes into Linus' tree later this week or early
next week.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>