| To: | Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption |
| From: | "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <prakashkc@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:22:32 +0100 |
| Cc: | William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan De Luyck <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1101237223.6358.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200411221530.30325.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> <20041122155106.GG2714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41A30D3E.9090506@xxxxxx> <1101237223.6358.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041114) |
Lee Revell schrieb: On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:13 +0100, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:Is xfs known to be broken while preempt is on? (Esp using ck's preemp big kernel lock?)Minor nitpick: Ingo wrote the preempt BKL code, not Con. Oh yes, I know, but it is in Con's kernel, and IIRC he merged nto all of his patches, so I thought this would be more precise. ;-) Prakash
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: Re: oops with dual xeon 2.8ghz 4gb ram +smp, software raid, lvm, and xfs, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption, Lee Revell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
