| To: | esr@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: problems in xfs_bmap.8, xfs_check.8 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:47:00 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200411210400.iAL40jcA014232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200411210400.iAL40jcA014232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 11:00:45PM -0500, esr@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > ... > My records indicate that you have accepted this patch, so this is just > a reminder. Please try to get a release with the patch incorporated > to the Fedora folks in time for Fedora Core 4. > ... Hmm, shouldn't this mail be directed toward the Fedora/Redhat people? The versions of packages that they ship is something they control, not us. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad superblock after lvextend, Frank J. Buchholz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: problems in xfs_bmap.8, xfs_check.8, Eric S. Raymond |
| Previous by Thread: | problems in xfs_bmap.8, xfs_check.8, esr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: problems in xfs_bmap.8, xfs_check.8, Eric S. Raymond |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |