[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [REPOST] [PATCH] fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.c

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [REPOST] [PATCH] fs/xfs/linux-2.6/kmem.c
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:23:06 +0000
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041126041132.GA1426@frodo> (from nathans@sgi.com on Fri Nov 26 05:11:32 2004)
References: <20041115103130.GA7971@cistron.nl> <20041117232247.GA9834@frodo> <1101386106l.15668l.0l@traveler> <20041126041132.GA1426@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 2004.11.26 05:11, Nathan Scott wrote:
I tweaked a couple of things, esp. keeping the uses of GFP flags
together in kmem.h and xfs_buf.c and dropped the timeout.  How
does the following patch fare for you?  (could you also send me
a Signed-off-by: line for when the final patch is merged in?)

Applied, compiled, module reloaded - looking good so far (half a day).

Index: xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
--- xfs-linux.orig/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
+++ xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c

The patch is reasonably trivial and you changed most lines, but feel free to add my Signed-off-by: line to it:

        Signed-off-by: Miquel van Smoorenburg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>