This person's stack overrun can be seen at:
http://www.icglink.com/cluster-debug-info.html
(search for dm_table_unplug_all+0x41/0x43)
It seems mainly to be due to XFS. Is there anything we can do about that?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:37:44 -0600
From: Phil Dier <phil@xxxxxxx>
To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Scott Holdren <scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ziggy <ziggy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jack Massari
<webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: oops with dual xeon 2.8ghz 4gb ram +smp, software raid, lvm, and
xfs
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:17:25 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> yow. The dread combination of XFS, LVM, software RAID and bloaty scsi
> drivers. Looks like a stack overrun.
>
> Can you rebuild the kernel with CONFIG_4KSTACKS=n?
>
Thanks for the suggestion.. I'm doing a burn-in right now with 8k
stacks, and so far, so good.
I'm building this system with stability and flexibility foremost in
mind. Am I foolish in using all of these technologies with a new-ish
version of 2.6? Is there a particular version that would be better
suited for my application? Any other suggestions you (or anyone else
on the list) could give regarding stability would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
--
Phil Dier (ICGLink.com -- 615 370-1530 x733)
/* vim:set noai nocindent ts=8 sw=8: */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|