| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: best linux kernel with memory management |
| From: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:22:11 +0200 (MEST) |
| Cc: | Martin MOKREJ? <mmokrejs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041029071429.GF1246@frodo> |
| References: | <412C87F3.2030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040825114005.GB13285@xxxxxxxxxx> <412C94F5.4010902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040825120450.GA22509@xxxxxxxxxx> <412C9D9C.6060703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040827121905.GG32707@xxxxxxxxxx> <417F6258.7010209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041028105108.GB5741@xxxxxxxxxx> <20041029071429.GF1246@frodo> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>> > >>>>kernel worked fine. Also 2.4.25 had problems which was on Gentoo >> > >>>>install CDROM. I don't remember exact their exact revisions, but I >> > >>>>shouldn't have used xfs also for /. I thought better xfs everywhere >> > >>>>than combined with reiserfs. Of course, /boot is ext3. > >There should be no problems using XFS for everything, including >/boot - I do that on all my systems (for a few years now). /boot (whose root is / for me) can be reiser, the bootload installer just needs to know that is has to unpack files otherwise they might not boot. Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: best linux kernel with memory management, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS strangeness, xfs_db out of memory, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: best linux kernel with memory management, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: best linux kernel with memory management, Rahul Karnik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |