| To: | <msz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: strange result of an XFS crash test |
| From: | "Stewart Smith" <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:09:37 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20041027101200.GB30788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041027101200.GB30788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Michal Szymanski said: > It that what I should expect from a journalling file system? Yes - the journalling protects the filesystem metadata, not your data. run a 'sync' (or fsync) after each file write and you'll get something quite different. -- Stewart Smith (stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) http://www.flamingspork.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_check problems on 3.6TB fs, Frank Hellmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 379] New: CVS Linux 2.4 and 2.6 build failure w/ CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: strange result of an XFS crash test, Johan Mulder |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 923980 - splitup pagebuf_get, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |