| To: | How Wong <grandsonata@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4 |
| From: | Juergen Sauer <juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:47:21 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41787436.7090604@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | AutomatiX GmbH |
| References: | <41787436.7090604@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7 |
Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 04:45 schrieb How Wong: > Hi > > I have been a XFS user on Fedora 2. Namesys claims Reiser4 to be > faster. what would you say in terms consistency in perfomance, > stability and scalability in comparison to the new Reiser4? Reiserfs4 is young and looks glourious in the specs and tests of the linux journals here in Germany. Within a lab for heavy duty test it may be ok, but IMHO not in productive environments. The scars from the faliures of reiserfs3 are too deep for me. I think in one or two years I will have a look. ;-> J. Sauer -- Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxx ** ** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen ** ** http://www.automatix.de ICQ: #344389676 ** OpenOffice erhalten Sie hier kostenfrei http://de.openoffice.org/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 376] New: xfs_force_shutdown called from line 1088 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 378] New: xfs does not set inode ctime if ATTR_CTIME flag is enabled, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4, Ralf Hildebrandt |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 376] New: xfs_force_shutdown called from line 1088 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |