xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4

To: How Wong <grandsonata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4
From: Juergen Sauer <juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:47:21 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <41787436.7090604@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: AutomatiX GmbH
References: <41787436.7090604@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7
Am Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 04:45 schrieb How Wong:
> Hi
>
> I have been a XFS user on Fedora 2.  Namesys claims Reiser4 to be
> faster. what would you say in terms consistency in perfomance,
> stability and scalability in comparison to the new Reiser4?
Reiserfs4 is young and looks glourious in the specs and tests of the
linux journals here in Germany.

Within a lab for heavy duty test it may be ok, but IMHO not in
productive environments.

The scars from the faliures of reiserfs3 are too deep for me.

I think in one or two years I will have a look. ;->

J. Sauer

-- 
Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxx **
** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen **
** http://www.automatix.de                    ICQ: #344389676   **
OpenOffice erhalten Sie hier kostenfrei http://de.openoffice.org/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>