| To: | How Wong <grandsonata@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4 |
| From: | Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:16:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41787436.7090604@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41787436.7090604@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
* How Wong <grandsonata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi > > I have been a XFS user on Fedora 2. Namesys claims Reiser4 to be faster. > what would you say in terms consistency in perfomance, stability and > scalability in comparison to the new Reiser4? ReiseFS4 is so young, one cannot possibly tell -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962 IT-Zentrum Standort CBF AIM. ralfpostfix |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4, How Wong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 376] New: xfs_force_shutdown called from line 1088 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4, How Wong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4, Juergen Sauer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |