| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4 |
| From: | How Wong <grandsonata@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:45:10 +1000 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) |
Hi I have been a XFS user on Fedora 2. Namesys claims Reiser4 to be faster.what would you say in terms consistency in perfomance, stability and scalability in comparison to the new Reiser4? thanks |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs out of diskspace issue, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4, Ralf Hildebrandt |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs out of diskspace issue, Thomas Ledbetter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS kernel 2.6 vs reiser4, Ralf Hildebrandt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |