| To: | Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Special, optimized mount options for a squid cache directory? |
| From: | evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 05 Oct 2004 22:59:40 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041005101019.GM23416@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041005101019.GM23416@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > Is there a set of recommended (recommended meaning: optimizing the > performance) mount options for a squid cache directory residing on an > XFS filesystem? - -o noatime would probably make sense for a cache/spool dir. but it's not bound to xfs really. Christian. PS: hm, some googling revealed http://eyck.forumakad.pl/~eyck/log/2004/03/ bad news for xfs in this report, but no real benchmarks shown, just unproven statements ;) - -- BOFH excuse #372: Forced to support NT servers; sysadmins quit. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBYws8C/PVm5+NVoYRAmfIAJwPDwlvLOe7brqeWnRdrzi2Gh+hEQCgr7H0 rOaZgvB3D/3ssm1AG/HVcGk= =Rw2o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS known issues ?, Ash |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Special, optimized mount options for a squid cache directory?, Ralf Hildebrandt |
| Previous by Thread: | Special, optimized mount options for a squid cache directory?, Ralf Hildebrandt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Special, optimized mount options for a squid cache directory?, Ralf Hildebrandt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |