xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Page cache write performance issue

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Page cache write performance issue
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:31:59 +1000
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041014071659.GB1768@frodo>
References: <20041013054452.GB1618@frodo> <20041012231945.2aff9a00.akpm@osdl.org> <20041013063955.GA2079@frodo> <20041013000206.680132ad.akpm@osdl.org> <20041013172352.B4917536@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <416CE423.3000607@cyberone.com.au> <20041013013941.49693816.akpm@osdl.org> <20041014005300.GA716@frodo> <20041013202041.2e7066af.akpm@osdl.org> <20041014071659.GB1768@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040820 Debian/1.7.2-4
Nathan Scott wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:20:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I just tried switching CONFIG_HIGHMEM off, and so running the
machine with 512MB; then adjusted the test to write 256M into
the page cache, again in 1K sequential chunks.  A similar mis-
behaviour happens, though the numbers are slightly better (up
from ~4 to ~6.5MB/sec).  Both ext2 and xfs see this.  When I
drop the file size down to 128M with this kernel, I see good
results again (as we'd expect).

No such problem here, with

        dd if=/dev/zero of=x bs=1k count=128k

on a 256MB machine. xfs and ext2.


Yup, rebooted with mem=128M and on my box, & that crawls.
Maybe its just this old hunk 'o junk, I suppose; odd that
2.6.8 was OK with this though.


Just out of interest, can you get profiles and a few lines of vmstat 1 from 2.6.8 and 2.6.9-rc, please?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>