xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Page cache write performance issue

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Page cache write performance issue
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:20:41 -0700
Cc: piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041014005300.GA716@frodo>
References: <20041013054452.GB1618@frodo> <20041012231945.2aff9a00.akpm@osdl.org> <20041013063955.GA2079@frodo> <20041013000206.680132ad.akpm@osdl.org> <20041013172352.B4917536@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <416CE423.3000607@cyberone.com.au> <20041013013941.49693816.akpm@osdl.org> <20041014005300.GA716@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:39:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  Andrew probably has better ideas.
>  > 
>  > uh, is this an ia32 highmem box?
> 
>  Yep, it is.
> 
>  > If so, you've hit the VM sour spot.
>  > ...
>  > Basically, *any* other config is fine.  896MB and below, 1.5GB and above.
> 
>  I just tried switching CONFIG_HIGHMEM off, and so running the
>  machine with 512MB; then adjusted the test to write 256M into
>  the page cache, again in 1K sequential chunks.  A similar mis-
>  behaviour happens, though the numbers are slightly better (up
>  from ~4 to ~6.5MB/sec).  Both ext2 and xfs see this.  When I
>  drop the file size down to 128M with this kernel, I see good
>  results again (as we'd expect).

No such problem here, with

        dd if=/dev/zero of=x bs=1k count=128k

on a 256MB machine.  xfs and ext2.

Can you exhibit this one more than one machine?

Silly question: what does `grep sync' /etc/fstab say over there? ;)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>