| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfs_fsr for directories? |
| From: | Bernhard Erdmann <be@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 08 Oct 2004 01:23:54 +0200 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040930 |
Hi, I've noticed on old and heavily used XFS filesystems (Newsspool oder Cyrus IMAP storage) even a "ls" command can take a very long time when there have been 10,000 to 50,000 files in a directory. "ls" spits out the remaining 5,000 filenames but then it sits and waits for several seconds (5-20 sec). # xfs_db -r -c "frag -d" /dev/vg1/news actual 4644, ideal 1891, fragmentation factor 59.28% # xfs_db -r -c "frag -d" /dev/vg1/imap actual 2299, ideal 424, fragmentation factor 81.56% xfs_fsr cleans up the files, but who cares about directories? How does XFS handle directories when files are deleted? Do they shrink as well? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: building xfsprogs (CVS): fadvise.c:71: `POSIX_FADV_NORMAL' undeclared (first use in this function), Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_repair problem in FS root, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 907752 - fix older glibc builds, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr for directories?, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |