| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes |
| From: | Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:24:37 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040922230940.A7344@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1CAF8J-0002e5-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095890867.2408.1.camel@localhost> <20040922230940.A7344@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 23:09 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:07:47AM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 16:58 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > With this in and the dcache patch from > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108330112505555&w=2 > > > we're surviving nfs_fsstress.sh for multiple hours now. Aka this > > > fixes BZ #309 > > > > > a second question comes to my mind: is this dcache stuff considered for a merge into linus/marcello tree in the near future? I have not seen any related discussion on lkml recently (I need to admit that I do not read lkml on a regulary basis...) cheers. - Christian |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |