xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes
From: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:24:37 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040922230940.A7344@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1CAF8J-0002e5-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1095890867.2408.1.camel@localhost> <20040922230940.A7344@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 23:09 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:07:47AM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 16:58 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > With this in and the dcache patch from 
> > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108330112505555&w=2
> > > we're surviving nfs_fsstress.sh for multiple hours now.  Aka this
> > > fixes BZ #309
> > > 
> > 

a second question comes to my mind:

is this dcache stuff considered for a merge into linus/marcello tree in
the near future? I have not seen any related discussion on lkml recently
(I need to admit that I do not read lkml on a regulary basis...)

cheers.
 - Christian




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>