xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Major XFS problems...

To: Anders Saaby <as@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Major XFS problems...
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:59:42 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <chnfn7$3t9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040908133954.GB390@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <413F1C6E.9040009@xxxxxxx> <20040908150713.GC390@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <413F3A31.8070906@xxxxxxx> <chnfn7$3t9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803)
Anders Saaby wrote:

Which slab cache(s) are growing... This is probably a "normal"
side-effect of iterating over millions of inodes.


Check http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/24/53 - That explains what we are seeing.

> > 03:00:                  06:00:
> > xfs_chashlist  91297    xfs_chashlist     151994
> > xfs_inode     243791    xfs_inode         586780
> > linvfs_icache 243791    linvfs_icache     586807
> > dentry_cache  196033    dentry_cache      430609

So your dentry cache doubled, and associated xfs data structures doubled along with it. This is not an xfs bug; xfs can't tear down it's inodes if dentries have them referenced...

I thought there were cache shrinkers in 2.6 that would shake out dentries when memory got low, though...

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>