xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes
From: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:53:32 +1000
Cc: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040922233013.A7496@infradead.org>
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc, Australian Software Group.
References: <E1CAF8J-0002e5-00@maine.americas.sgi.com> <1095890867.2408.1.camel@localhost> <20040922230940.A7344@infradead.org> <1095891877.2408.10.camel@localhost> <20040922233013.A7496@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 08:30, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > a second question comes to my mind:
> > 
> > is this dcache stuff considered for a merge into linus/marcello tree in
> > the near future? I have not seen any related discussion on lkml recently
> > (I need to admit that I do not read lkml on a regulary basis...)
> 
> I think Greg Banks has been working with Neil on this one, Greg do you
> know if/what is blocking to get this patch into mainline?

No technical reason AFAICT, the discussion just petered out.  I've
pinged Neil to see if he can resubmit one of the series of patches
from back in April.

Greg.
-- 
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>