| To: | Pavel Kiryukhin <savl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bad block number and bad nblocks after simple file operations. |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:50:39 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41487343.5010009@dev.rtsoft.ru>; from savl@dev.rtsoft.ru on Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:52:19PM +0400 |
| References: | <41487343.5010009@dev.rtsoft.ru> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 08:52:19PM +0400, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: > My platform is MIPS (LE and BE), 2.4.20 kernel Sorry, but that's a totally outdated kernel version. There have been quite a few issues with XFS on less common plattforms in the past, please try 2.4.28-rc or 2.6.8/2.6.9-rc instead. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad block number and bad nblocks after simple file operations., Pavel Kiryukhin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 363] New: segfault of user-app while triggering dmapi event, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bad block number and bad nblocks after simple file operations., Pavel Kiryukhin |
| Next by Thread: | xfs_force_shutdown called on hardware RAID5+0 XFS filesystem, slaton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |