| To: | James Foris <james.foris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+ |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:59:14 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4145D141.1040907@med.ge.com>; from james.foris@med.ge.com on Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:56:33AM -0500 |
| References: | <411A8410.2030000@med.ge.com> <20040910041106.GA14336@frodo> <4144B19A.2020407@med.ge.com> <4145D141.1040907@med.ge.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi James, On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:56:33AM -0500, James Foris wrote: > > More correctly, it happened between 2.6.5 and 2.6.5-bk1 > > So..... something in the 2.6.5-bk1 patchset caused the change. > Any suggestions where to begin looking (other than fs/direct_io.x) ? http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/patch-2.6.5-bk1.log search for "direct" -- looks like -bk1 includes all the changes I was refering to earlier (and a bunch more) :( So, the needle is somewhere in that haystack... cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | aio (maybe XFS) bug?, Jesse Barnes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: aio (maybe XFS) bug?, Jesse Barnes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+, James Foris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+, James Foris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |