| To: | Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS recovery issues |
| From: | Ash <my_qa2004@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:31:33 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-reply-to: | <FC9842391A6A3AEBBF696909@[10.1.2.77]> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Uhm, what do you expect, you tried to break it and
> suceeded. Any box
> treated like that in production will need to be
> seriously rethought as to
> what/how it should be implemented.
>
Agreed. Although my concern is not in the number of
cycles the test was run. What bothers me is that this
could have very well happened in the first couple of
crashes as well.
I just wanted to make sure that there wasn't some
obvious problem lurking here and hence the post.
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Michael Loftis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |