| To: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fedora Core 2 with XFS |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:21:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | Matthew Geier <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <22931.1092182602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <22931.1092182602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Macintosh/20040626) |
Keith Owens wrote: One small data point. Having just done two upgrades from RH9 to FC2 with nothing but XFS partitions, the upgrade worked fine. However there are hints (IOW I could be talking through my hat here) that the 2.6 kernel in FC2 is more rigorous about checking XFS file structuresthan the 2.4 kernel in RH8/9. Keith, what makes you say this? I take it that you saw problems which prompted you to run repair over the filesystems? Thanks, -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fedora Core 2 with XFS, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+, James Foris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fedora Core 2 with XFS, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fedora Core 2 with XFS, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |