Re: oops release-1.3.3-pre2/x86_64 from Scientific Linux

[Tru Huynh <tru@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:10:51PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 08:52:40AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > what does your ffs() look like?  I added this patch to our kernels, but 
> > it may not be in Dan's kernels (hm, I need to update the 1.3.3 packages 
> > we have on oss...)
> > 
> > --- linux/include/asm-x86_64/bitops.h.orig      2004-07-26 
> > 12:33:54.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/bitops.h   2004-07-26 12:35:23.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static __inline__ int ffs(int x)
> > 
> >          __asm__("bsfl %1,%0\n\t"
> >                  "cmovzl %2,%0"
> > -               : "=r" (r) : "g" (x), "r" (32));
> > +               : "=r" (r) : "rm" (x), "r" (-1));
> >          return r+1;
> >   }
> include/asm-x86_64/bitops.h
> ...
>     470 static __inline__ int ffs(int x)
>     471 {
>     472         int r;
>     473 
>     474         __asm__("bsfl %1,%0\n\t"
>     475                 "cmovzl %2,%0"
>     476                 : "=r" (r) : "g" (x), "r" (32));
>     477         return r+1;
>     478 }
> 
> I am changing line 476 to :"=r" (r) : "rm" (x), "r" (-1));
> I will post the results ASAP.

Yes!!!! that works (mount read-only for the moment)
but I can access the files there :D

**Best regards**,

Tru