| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 904196 - update split patches |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Aug 2004 22:25:10 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <200408090421.i794LHJ12766@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200408090421.i794LHJ12766@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 02:21:17PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > Update 2.4 split patches for 2.4.27 merge. > > Date: Sun Aug 8 21:20:28 PDT 2004 > Workarea: chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/nathans/2.4.x-xfs > Inspected by: nathans > > The following file(s) were checked into: > bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.4.x-xfs > > > Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:linux:176622a > split-patches/series - 1.8 > split-patches/rwsem-backport - 1.2 > split-patches/downgrade_write-backport - 1.2 how important are these particular patches? is there any serious issue with using 2.4.27 mainline? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 352] Compilation failure in sendfile.c, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE 904196 - update split patches, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 904196 - update split patches, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 904196 - update split patches, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |