Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken

[Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:10:49PM +0200, Jan Banan wrote:

> I suppose the value of Reallocated_Sector_Ct (1459) is not a good
> sign :-(

No.  It means the disk has probably been failing for a little while
before you noticed it or it got really bad really fast, neither of
which are good.

> I also run "badblocks /dev/hdh" and it did find 593 bad blocks
> before the kernel crashed (I suppose) with (like it did with "dd"):

i'm surpised it dies here,  what does sysrq-t say?

> According to the man-page of "dd" then "seek" and "skip" skips
> "ibs/obs-sized BLOCKS" and not "SECTORS". So am I typing the correct
> value (28117692)?

for bs=512 the 'dd BLOCKS' are sectors.