xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken
From: "Net Llama!" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:31:13 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040731182849.GC11283@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: HAL V
References: <40F6DBC1.6050909@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040715205910.GA9948@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40F9321C.7060403@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040717203943.GL20260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <410ADC0A.6060100@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040731054924.GA4748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <410B4BC3.8000404@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040731091220.GA6158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <410BCFA7.6090709@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040731182849.GC11283@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040716
On 07/31/2004 11:28 AM, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 09:58:15AM -0700, Net Llama! wrote:


Out of sheer curiosity, what kind of 'craptop' drive is this?


HITACHI DK23EB-40 (it's failry new, only 1 yr or so old, so I'm no
thrilled about IO errors at all but otherwise it seems to be working
pertty well).  I'm wondering if it's worse than it might otherwise be
because the machine is moved about very often and gets a very hard
life.

Nah, that sounds like about the quality i've come to know & hate from Hitachi (AKA IBM) drives of late. When I have a choice, i stick with Seagate.


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:                    http://netllama.ipfox.com

 11:30:00 up 40 days, 22:14,  2 users,  load average: 0.31, 0.23, 0.15


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>