xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bugzilla vs. bugzilla

To: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bugzilla vs. bugzilla
From: Rainer Traut <rainer.traut@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:46:32 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040728103708.GA26088@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040728103708.GA26088@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7+ (Windows/20040725)
Hi,

Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:

I've reported a few xfs-kernel problems to the standard
bugzilla.kernel.org lately, but the response from the XFS-team seems
very slow/lacking. Ref:

        http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929 http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118

Am I using the wrong bugzilla? Should all XFS-problems go to
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla ? I hope not, since it's often not clear
to me if it's a NFSD (or other component) or XFS bug..


It seems you're running a RH Enterprise 3 clone?
From what I read on the taroon mailing list, all the userland tools
are not ready for kernel 2.6 yet and the developers do not recommend doing this.
Have you considered this? Maybe it's working fine though.

Gruss
Rainer


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>