On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:39:03AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> either one should be fine, we get email from both. If you're not
> certain it's an xfs bug, then osdl.org would be a better choice.
> Regarding speed of response, it's mostly an issue of time & resources,
> although your bug 2929 was resolved in 1 day, I think, and the last
> one was just bumped over to xfs from nfs, IIRC.
Yes, bug 2929 was quick. While 2841 hasn't gotten any response in ~2
months, and now 3118 hasn't had any response since Trond moved it to
XFS 3 days ago. Unless I get timely response, I'm forced to bet on
luck and jump to the latest release/pre-release hoping it's fixed
there, or convert to another fs :(
BTW: Together with bug 2840 these problems have oopsed my server about
every second week since I installed it with 2.6.6.
> FWIW, it looks like you're getting memory allocation failures
> in some of these cases.
Meaning xfs problems, other kernel component error, or hw?