xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bugzilla vs. bugzilla

To: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bugzilla vs. bugzilla
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:39:03 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040728103708.GA26088@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
either one should be fine, we get email from both.  If you're not
certain it's an xfs bug, then osdl.org would be a better choice.

Regarding speed of response, it's mostly an issue of time & resources,
although your bug 2929 was resolved in 1 day, I think, and the last
one was just bumped over to xfs from nfs, IIRC.

FWIW, it looks like you're getting memory allocation failures
in some of these cases.

-Eric


On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:

> I've reported a few xfs-kernel problems to the standard
> bugzilla.kernel.org lately, but the response from the XFS-team seems
> very slow/lacking. Ref:
> 
>       http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841
>       http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929 
>       http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118
> 
> Am I using the wrong bugzilla? Should all XFS-problems go to
> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla ? I hope not, since it's often not clear
> to me if it's a NFSD (or other component) or XFS bug..
> 
> 
>   -jf
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>