| To: | Matthew Geier <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1 |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:04:18 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4102E006.3070309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <00cf01c47171$fabcb210$0100a8c0@valleychase> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407241103160.16275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4102E006.3070309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 08:17:42AM +1000, Matthew Geier wrote: > It's all there, it's just if you do an XFS install and xfsprogs is > the only package it needs from CD4, at the start it won't say it > needs CD4, it will just 'spring that on you' later on when it > actually needs CD4 to get the xfsprogs packages off it. this might sound silly, but i've never done a fc install so humor me... i assume you can install *almost* everything you absolutely need from the first CD right? except for xfsprogs on CD4 --- if that is the case shouldn't someone open a bug with RH to have this mode to CD1 (since it's small I can't see why this would be a big deal) --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1, Matthew Geier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1, Matthew Geier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |