| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.7-vanilla-SMP kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages |
| From: | L A Walsh <lkml@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:21:25 -0700 |
| Cc: | Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040722001224.GC30595@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <40FF0479.6050509@xxxxxxxxx> <20040722001224.GC30595@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) |
Will this be included/fixed in 2.6.8?How serious is the problem? The system doesn't seem to panic or indicate backup failures.Setting up a CVS tree to get a patch for a "stable-series" kernel seems a bit unstable. I'm not sure what I'd pull in besides the fix or even if I'd pull down a coherent/stable CVS image if I downloaded in the middle of when someother patch was being checked in. Maybe I'm sounding like a wimp, but the idea of pulling in freshly checked in CVS code for use on a 'stable' machine is bordering on my discomfort zone. :-) -l Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:04:09PM -0700, L A Walsh wrote:Any idea what this message means?it means "try the CVS tree" (i think hch fixed this and it's in CVS but not mainline) --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.7-vanilla-SMP kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.7-vanilla-SMP kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.7-vanilla-SMP kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.7-vanilla-SMP kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |