| To: | Ricardo Correia <wizeman@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Null files reloaded :-) |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:46:13 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040720060934.GA8839@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200407200444.21761.wizeman@xxxxxxxx> <20040720060934.GA8839@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:09:34PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> KDE is known to be bad here, there is a trivial fix the KDE people
> could make but they basically said "use a better fs" or something
> silly (by sane fs they seem to mean ext3 and that's not an option
> for many many people, all the world is not Linux, etc).
that said, it seems they did listen several days ago when this was
pointed out:
http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/kdelibs/kdecore/ktempfile.cpp.diff?r1=1.30&r2=1.31
--cw
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Null files reloaded :-), Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | JFS or XFS for GNU/Linux production Server?, matthias . hofer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Null files reloaded :-), Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Null files reloaded :-), Ricardo Correia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |