xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mount: Function not implemented?

To: Anthony Biacco <ABiacco@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mount: Function not implemented?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:08:52 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <74918D8CA17F7C418753F01078F10B6BD08560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <74918D8CA17F7C418753F01078F10B6BD08560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615)
Anthony Biacco wrote:
But it's a 64-bit system.
How do people get oracle performing on enterprise class hardware, with
linux, with such a low page size?
Do you just have to say, the hell with it, and create a raw device?


Raw devices don't do any bigger I/O's, this is merely the unit of
allocation used by the filesystem, not the unit of I/O to the disk
drives. XFS will still allocate disk space in large contiguous
chunks.

Large block sizes I think helped Irix more than they would Linux.

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>