xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: mount: Function not implemented?

To: "Chris Wedgwood" <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: mount: Function not implemented?
From: "Anthony Biacco" <ABiacco@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:29:24 -0600
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcRt3v1skCnc6bX2TmGqVlJ7NrVXhgAAH8Kg
Thread-topic: mount: Function not implemented?
ok, elaborate please. It's a valid parameter, yes? From what I
understand XFS can do up to 64k blocksizes. Am I mistaken?

--Tony
------------------------------
Anthony J. Biacco
Systems/Network Administrator
Quris, Inc.
720-836-2015

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Wedgwood [mailto:cw@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:23 PM
To: Anthony Biacco
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mount: Function not implemented?

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:19:22PM -0600, Anthony Biacco wrote:

> Trying to use a blocksize of 16k to match my oracle block size and HW 
> RAID5 stripe size.

don't do that :)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>