| To: | "Chris Wedgwood" <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: mount: Function not implemented? |
| From: | "Anthony Biacco" <ABiacco@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:29:24 -0600 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcRt3v1skCnc6bX2TmGqVlJ7NrVXhgAAH8Kg |
| Thread-topic: | mount: Function not implemented? |
ok, elaborate please. It's a valid parameter, yes? From what I understand XFS can do up to 64k blocksizes. Am I mistaken? --Tony ------------------------------ Anthony J. Biacco Systems/Network Administrator Quris, Inc. 720-836-2015 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wedgwood [mailto:cw@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:23 PM To: Anthony Biacco Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: mount: Function not implemented? On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:19:22PM -0600, Anthony Biacco wrote: > Trying to use a blocksize of 16k to match my oracle block size and HW > RAID5 stripe size. don't do that :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: mount: Function not implemented?, Michael Loftis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mount: Function not implemented?, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: mount: Function not implemented?, Michael Loftis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mount: Function not implemented?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |