| To: | Toralf Lund <toralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux 2.6 and v1 directories? |
| From: | Seth Mos <seth.mos@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:36:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4109FF45.90108@procaptura.com> |
| References: | <40ED0738.7040309@procaptura.com> <20040730003809.GC1946@frodo> <4109FF45.90108@procaptura.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) |
Toralf Lund wrote: Nathan Scott wrote: And always will be? It might work, however fixing and testing it is very low on to the todo list. There are not many cases of people needing to mount volumes with v1 directories. The only place to find them are IRIX volumes, which need to have a 4K blocksize, cleanly unmounted and the journal cleared before it can be mounted on Intel. There is no sensible need whatsoever for v1 directories if you only use linux. Those that need to be able to mount IRIX disks can always bug the SGI support channels :-) Cheers Seth |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux 2.6 and v1 directories?, Toralf Lund |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 351] New: XFS internal error xlog_clear_stale_blocks, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.6 and v1 directories?, Toralf Lund |
| Next by Thread: | corrupted partition and xfs_repair terminates, Tupshin Harper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |