xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: mount: Function not implemented?

To: "Steve Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: mount: Function not implemented?
From: "Anthony Biacco" <ABiacco@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:50:05 -0600
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcRt4ZQ839mAx6K1Rh2g4bjodutJKQAAB86Q
Thread-topic: mount: Function not implemented?
But it's a 64-bit system.
How do people get oracle performing on enterprise class hardware, with
linux, with such a low page size?
Do you just have to say, the hell with it, and create a raw device?

-Tony
------------------------------
Anthony J. Biacco
Systems/Network Administrator
Quris, Inc.
720-836-2015

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lord [mailto:lord@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:40 PM
To: Anthony Biacco
Cc: Chris Wedgwood; linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mount: Function not implemented?

Anthony Biacco wrote:
> ok, elaborate please. It's a valid parameter, yes? From what I 
> understand XFS can do up to 64k blocksizes. Am I mistaken?

Not on linux, it can only do filesystem blocksize upto pagesize.
So on ia32 it maxes out at 4K.

Steve




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>