[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1

To: Jameel Akari <jakari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1
From: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:49:19 -0500 (EST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0407191300290.224073@poptart.bithose.com>
References: <1068144421.1405.4.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311061353200.5397-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <20031106201337.GG13576@puariko.nirvana> <1068152873.1405.6.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407191116230.22405@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <Pine.OSF.4.58.0407191236550.224073@poptart.bithose.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407191145300.15814@mail.linux-sxs.org> <Pine.OSF.4.58.0407191300290.224073@poptart.bithose.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Jameel Akari wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, L. Friedman wrote:
> > > install any xfsprogs (mkfs.xfs, xfsdump, etc.) or acl stuff - and the
> > > installer won't create XFS partitions - just ext2,ext3.
> >
> > That wasn't my experience (and what's an 'XFS partition')?  FC2 installs
> It's typo, mostly, obviously I meant "filesystem,"  I'm just thinking of
> the installer's Disk Druid partitioning at the same time.

Well, since Disk Druid, fdisk, et al still refer to the process as 
partitioning the disk, I don't think the term is really all that 
inappropropriate.  I use the term, myself, all the time.

But that could just be me.

Mike Burger

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000

To be notified of updates to the web site, visit 
http://www.bubbanfriends.org/mailman/listinfo/site-update, or send a 
message to:


with a message of: 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>