xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.7 oops

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.6.7 oops
From: "Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi" <gcs@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:46:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407121230130.6438@mail.linux-sxs.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407121230130.6438@mail.linux-sxs.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
* Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-07-12 12:33:27 -0500]:

> I'm running a vanilla 2.6.7 on a workstation.  It appears to have Oops'ed
> yesterday morning while the slocate/updatedb cronjob was running:
[...]
> Jul 11 04:07:39 netllama kernel:  <6>note: updatedb[25042] exited with
> preempt_count 1
> Jul 11 04:07:39 netllama kernel: bad: scheduling while atomic!
> Jul 11 04:07:39 netllama kernel:  [schedule+1210/1264]
> schedule+0x4ba/0x4f0
[...]
> The box seems to be stable since then (i've not rebooted it yet), although
> the updatedb cronjob is hung.  I'm not 100% certain that this is a XFS
> issue, but since i see a ton of xfs references in the oops, i'm asking
> here first.  thanks.
 Well, I have seen such problems on other kernels as well (2.6.7 ->
2.6.7-bk20), running on machines without any XFS partition. Thus I tend
to say it is an other kernel bug (scheduling problems are not related to
XFS anyway IMHO). It seems running on 2.8.1-rc1 is a better idea, as I
heard 2.6.7 had different small problems as well.

Regards,
Laszlo


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 2.6.7 oops, Net Llama!
    • Re: 2.6.7 oops, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <=