| To: | Raphael Bauduin <raphael.bauduin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS partition problem |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:43:24 -0500 (CDT) |
| Cc: | evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <40DC173B.3040603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Raphael Bauduin wrote: > No. Maybe I didn't explain clearly. I wondered if the fact that I used a > 2.4.26 (with a different > XFS version I gues) at a time could have changed the XFS partition in a > problematic way > (if it hadn't been unmounted cleanly eg). xfs stays compatible across kernel versions. -eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS partition problem, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS + LVM + Software RAID5 on Debian testing, Charles Steinkuehler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS partition problem, Raphael Bauduin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS partition problem, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |