| To: | Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:07:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040624150307.GH1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040622082906.GA2093@frodo> <20040623084922.GD1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040623203639.A1670881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040623131611.GE1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040624024320.GB5866@frodo> <20040624114608.GF1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040624121441.GA9419@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040624135722.GG1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040624145545.GA11382@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040624150307.GH1323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote: > I didn't think about it actually. As I recall there have been > some bug reports from xfs users who had CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y and > they were suggested not to enable it unless asked to :) > Yes, that definitely may be the reason why I didn't enable it. > > I'll turn it on and re-test if desired. Would be nice if you could as it would greatly help if you'd trigger some assert instead of the memory corruption. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS + LVM + Software RAID5 on Debian testing, Kevin P. Fleming |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS/LVM Setup and SATA RAID Hardware Recommendations, Sarwer Zafiruddin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |