| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs on raid questions |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:53:35 -0700 |
| Cc: | Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <seth.mos@xxxxxxxxx>, campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040618215206.GA28367@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040617152353.GB2511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1D87D.9030208@xxxxxxx> <20040617184510.GB4309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D2BC7E.3040402@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406180851210.10588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040618215034.GA16343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040618215206.GA28367@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:52:06PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It's always 16TB as that's a pagecache limit (page->index is a 32bit > scalar in PAGE_CACHE_SIZE = 4k units). Yeah, I was more worried about signedness cleanliness as some people has trouble over 8TB apparently. --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs on raid questions, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Maximum Direct-IO size on x86 platform, Faerstain, Bert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs on raid questions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs on raid questions, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |