xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs on raid questions

To: Seth Mos <seth.mos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs on raid questions
From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <40D2BC7E.3040402@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040617152353.GB2511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D1D87D.9030208@xxxxxxx> <20040617184510.GB4309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40D2BC7E.3040402@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 at 11:57am, Seth Mos wrote

> Chuck Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 12:44:29PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > 
> > If the linux server works well in the proof of concept, it will be a one
> > time, one way move.  I had mostly hoped to avoid a dump to tape, mkfs,
> > restore from tape, since tape is really SLOOOOOW and requires a LOT of
> > human intervention for a couple of Tb.
> 
> Note that ia32 has a 2TB blockdevice limit in 2.4. And even 1TB in RHEL 
> 3, wonky things start happening if it's larger.
> 2.6 can go larger, but only with a 64bit box. eg. alpha, itanium, amd64.

Err, I had not heard anything regarding issues with >1TB and 2.6 on ia32.  
AIUI, that should work just fine.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>