xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 895751 - unwritten extent buffer fix

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 895751 - unwritten extent buffer fix
From: Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:23:13 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200406150155.i5F1t4DM69795530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200406150155.i5F1t4DM69795530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 19:55, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Ensure buffers that map to unwritten extents are only submitted
> when properly setup.
> 
> Date:  Mon Jun 14 18:54:08 PDT 2004
> Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/nathans/ultra-clean-xfs-linux
> Inspected by:  cattelan@xxxxxxx
> 
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/xfs-kern/xfs-linux
> 
> 
> Modid:  xfs-linux:xfs-kern:173555a
> linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c - 1.73
> linux-2.4/xfs_aops.c - 1.80
> 
> 

So is this patch the same/similar to the patch that Manasori 
Tsuda worked up, or is was the problem solved differently
(related to differences in xfs_inode and inode)?

Craig



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>