Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
It should pass, since it should be redoing things as buffered io the
same way my patch did. We'll call dio_complete differently, but I'm
unclear on how much that really matters.
That only affects XFS and yes, it was wrong. This will hopefully fix it
up.
--- 25/fs/direct-io.c~direct-io-hole-fix 2004-06-02 18:27:16.021168440
-0700
+++ 25-akpm/fs/direct-io.c 2004-06-02 21:40:52.660170880 -0700
@@ -987,13 +987,6 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i
}
} /* end iovec loop */
- if (ret == -ENOTBLK && rw == WRITE) {
- /*
- * The remaining part of the request will be
- * be handled by buffered I/O when we return
- */
- ret = 0;
- }
/*
* There may be some unwritten disk at the end of a part-written
* fs-block-sized block. Go zero that now.
@@ -1060,24 +1053,29 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i
kfree(dio);
}
} else {
+ ssize_t transferred = 0;
+
finished_one_bio(dio);
ret2 = dio_await_completion(dio);
if (ret == 0)
ret = ret2;
if (ret == 0)
ret = dio->page_errors;
- if (ret == 0 && dio->result) {
+ if (dio->result) {
loff_t i_size = i_size_read(inode);
- ret = dio->result;
+ transferred = dio->result;
/*
* Adjust the return value if the read crossed a
* non-block-aligned EOF.
*/
- if (rw == READ && (offset + ret > i_size))
- ret = i_size - offset;
+ if (rw == READ && (offset + transferred > i_size))
+ transferred = i_size - offset;
}
- dio_complete(dio, offset, ret);
+ dio_complete(dio, offset, transferred);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = transferred;
+
/* We could have also come here on an AIO file extend */
if (!is_sync_kiocb(iocb) && rw == WRITE &&
ret >= 0 && dio->result == dio->size)
@@ -1088,6 +1086,13 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i
aio_complete(iocb, ret, 0);
kfree(dio);
}
+ if (ret == -ENOTBLK && rw == WRITE) {
+ /*
+ * The entire request will be be handled by buffered I/O
+ * when we return
+ */
+ ret = 0;
+ }
return ret;
}
_
But it's hard to tell because XFS fails the below tests. Tested with and
without the recent direct-io fixups. Tested 2.6.7-rc2. Tested 2.6.2.
2.4.27-pre4 as well. In all cases, XFS fails.
fsx-linux -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -N 10000 junk -R -W
fsx-linux -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 2048 -w 2048 -Z -N 10000 junk -R -W
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 8192 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 2048 -w 2048 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 16384 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 32768 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 2048 -w 2048 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 128000 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 8192 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 2048 -w 2048 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 16384 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 32768 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 2048 -w 2048 -Z -R -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 128000 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -W junk
fsx-linux -N 10000 -o 128000 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -W junk
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@xxxxxxxxx";>aart@xxxxxxxxx</a>