| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS |
| From: | Rainer Traut <rainer.traut@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Jun 2004 08:35:49 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1086197503.32683.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <219426257.20040602150824@xxxxxx> <20040602142044.GU22280@xxxxxxx> <1086197503.32683.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) |
Hi, have you run any stress test with these kernels? I guess you have, how are the results? Thanks Rainer Eric Sandeen wrote: You can also get our packages for RHEL+XFS from ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/release-1.3.3-pre2/kernels/RHEL/ -Eric On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 09:20, Nathan Straz wrote:On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:08:24PM +0600, ??????? ?????? ??????????? wrote:I've recompile my kernel (RedHat Ent. v3 - 2.4.21-15EL) with myself made patches. Could you tell me how to test this kernel on stability? to make me sure that kernel works correctly after those patchesIf you check out the xfs-cmds tree there is a directory xfstests. You can run those to verify XFS is working. If you want general kernel tests you should look at the Linux Test Project. See the URL in my signature. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Scan after crash, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: XFS, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |