| To: | Måns Rullgård <mru@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs partition refuses to mount |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 May 2004 08:43:38 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <yw1xk6ytbbgo.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Måns Rullgård <mru@xxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <40B8D24A.4080703@xxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.33.0405291528450.14297-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040531113141.A1116544@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yw1xk6ytbbgo.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 04:02:31AM +0200, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > Until May 20 (just over a week ago) recovery on sparc64 (and big endian > > 64) did not work. A fix went into xfs_bit.c thanks to Nicolas > > Boullis. (Our XFS qa tests are routinely run on intel cpus) > > What about 64-bit little endian? I'm using XFS on Alpha, and it seems > to be working. Is there something I should watch out for? 64bit Little Endian is fine, it gets regular testing on Altix (IA64), I'm also testing 32bit Big Endian, so only 64bit BE was the problem. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re[2]: XFS, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Evms-devel] XFS + evms + x86_64 + network hangs..., Hendrik Visage |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] O_DIRECT hole filling bug, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs corruption or not, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |